The Arms Race

Posted by arvind s grover Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:57:00 GMT

Social networking sites have sent schools around the country into a tizzy. People have been shocked to see the type of material being posted by students.

In response, many schools with well-thought-out policies on filtering, have started to block many of the sites in question. For some this is a liabilty decision, for others, school is a place for school-designated use of the web, and not much else.

Deeper look: filtering itself creates a new set of challenges. Students are drawn to these websites for reasons many adults can’t understand. Removing access to the sites becomes a small technical hurdle for many students. Their answer, using a web proxy to outsmart the filter, and they are back on their favorite social website. This is a battle that network technologists can’t win. They block more sites, and students find more workarounds; then it begins again.

I call this The Arms Race

Suddenly, the relationship between technologists and students has shifted from collaborative to combative. And in an education context, this is a huge hurdle.

We want students to come with us when they are concerned about online issues, not worried about hiding from us. Yes, of course we think it is a bad idea to post pictures of yourself in your underwear. Yes, it is an awful idea for a 14 year old to post information about where s/he lives. And yes, we still want to know why they do it and how we can all come to an agreement on what would be a more constructive use of these sites.

p.s. a colleague of mine first used the words “the arms race,” but I am trying to expand the context for it

Posted in safety, law, net generation | 2 comments | no trackbacks

Student Blogging

Posted by arvind s grover Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:30:00 GMT

Students are blogging. There is no denying it. Schools are becoming concerned over the content of these blogs for a number of reasons:
  • students are putting themselves in physical jeopardy (the stalker problem)
  • students are putting their reputations in jeopardy (the college admissions problem)
  • students are defaming their schools/teachers (the unflattering press problem)
The Electronic Frontier Foundation whose mission is to protect civil liberties in the networked world have recently put out a legal guide for student blogging. It is a well-written piece outline recent legal rulings on student blogging. The bottom line seems to be the following:
  • public schools probably cannot discipline students for non-school blogs that critique the school or teachers (even harshly or with vulgarity)
  • private schools can discipline students in most cases, unless the school has agreed to follow certain public guidelines for protecting student speech
  • advocating violence/crime in a student blog is pretty much never protected speech
  • some states have extended federal protections for student speech

The big concept for me is that students shouldn’t need to be exploring their legal options for speaking their mind. We should be educating them on their rights. Right? Even more importantly, we should be discussing and exploring the ramifications of their speech. Students should learn how powerful speech is, how valuable it is, and how fortunate we are to be able to speak freely (and when we are not). Otherwise, how can we expect them to make wise decisions about how to best use their speech. Unless they truly understand the consequences, we should expect decisions that we do not agree with. An adult saying NO just won’t suffice. It may help for a short period, but is just a band-aid solution.

Posted in net generation, literacy, safety | no comments | no trackbacks

FreeMind

Posted by arvind s grover Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:20:00 GMT

Saw John Palfrey speak today, but this post is just to bring attention to the rock-star software he ran his presentation with. He was using a concept-mapping software called Mind Manager (Windows only). It was super-sexy, try it out.

update: a colleague of mine pointed me to FreeMind, an open-source concept-mapping tool that looks a lot like Mind Manager (or maybe it is the other way around). Either way, free and open-source sounds way better to me.

Posted in software | 3 comments | no trackbacks

John Palfrey

Posted by arvind s grover Thu, 10 Nov 2005 03:36:00 GMT

I saw John Palfrey [his blog], Executive Director of Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society speak today at the New York Association of Independent Schools (NYSAIS) Conference for IT Managers today. What a tremendous speaker, and I couldn’t be more envious of his job – basically to think about all the amazing new technologies and how they are impacting the world. Cool, right?

Posted in law, literacy, media | no comments | no trackbacks

Ourmedia

Posted by arvind s grover Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:00 GMT

Ourmedia is wonderful resource for educators using digital media (sound, video, text, images, text). Ourmedia will host any media file you have for free! [no media you don’t own please] No more worrying about storage or bandwith. The even give you RSS feeds to power your own podcasts.

How is this good for educators? Students can create their own music, own films, own images and put them out there for the public to use. One of the best pieces – they can license their own work: choose Creative Commoons, choose traditional copyright, and more.

What a great exercise in ethical use of media, students can actually decide how their media is used. The though of someone pirating their work makes the discussion of online music/movie piracy much more authentic.

Posted in media, software | no comments | no trackbacks

To Moodle or not to Moodle

Posted by arvind s grover Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:38:00 GMT

Moodle is a free course management system. Great, what is a course management system?

The basics:
  • a web site
  • teachers log in to manage their course website
  • students log in to interact with their courses’ websites

Doesn’t sound like much, but stay with it. This tool is powerful for teachers. Why? Mainly, because it is powerful for students. Student love Moodle. They are so compelled by the interface and the activities, that they spend time on your website rather than other, let’s say, less helpful ones.

Some of the great features: discussion boards, electronic assignment submission, online journals, chat rooms, wiki’s, glossaries and more. These are just tools, but the way in which Moodle uses them is the real beauty.

You as a teacher add an assignment. Automatically, when students log in, the assignment shows up in their calendar. You create a glossary in your Economics course. Students are responsible for entering 10 terms that you assign. They each enter their definitions, and other students + the teacher can comment on their definitions until collectively an agreement is made. Now the beautiful part – any time you use a word from the glossary, say “interest rate” for example, it is automatically linked to the glossary entry. If you create an assignment with the sentence, “Calculate the currently available interest rate,” interest rate shows up as a link to the glossary. How great, no more, “what does {fill in the blank term} mean?”

Ok, not sold? Well, just try it, it’s free! Your students will either love it or hate it, and you can move on. Easiest way to try it. Get a <$10/month web hosting package that has Fantastico—Fantastico lets you install free, open-source programs with a few mouse clicks. It’s simple, really.

I use Site5 to host this website and have been very happy with them. Their tech support is 24/7 and they generally respond within a few minutes! If you want to help support this site, sign up through Site5.

Have your own web server already? Even cheaper, just follow the Moodle install instructions. Would love to hear your findings with Moodle…

Posted in software | no comments | no trackbacks

Older posts: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23